Underwriting is not the lender's opinion of you. It is a federal legal duty, and Regulation Z names the exact eight things a lender has to weigh. It no longer names a 43 percent debt-to-income limit — the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau removed that in December 2020 — and almost every article you will find still says otherwise. Here is what the rule actually requires, why the old number will not die, and where FHA's identical-looking 43 fits in.
General information, not professional financial, tax, legal, or insurance advice. The Dreamy Leads Research is an editorial and data team, not a licensed advisor.
Want real rates for your own scenario?
Free · no obligation · about 2 minutes
Chapters
- 0:05 Underwriting is a legal duty
- 0:32 The eight things a lender must weigh
- 1:00 Stated income is finished
- 1:27 The forty-three percent rule is repealed
- 1:58 Why the old number will not die
- 2:30 A price test, not a ratio
- 3:01 FHA's thirty-one forty-three is a different number
- 3:30 Clear to close is not official
See your 2026 numbers
The figures in this explainer come from our live dataset. Explore them for your own state or metro:
Full transcript
Underwriting is a legal duty
An underwriter answers one question with documents: will this borrower repay this loan on these terms. Regulation Z makes it a duty, not a preference. A creditor shall not make a covered loan unless it makes a reasonable and good faith determination that the consumer will have a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. Underwriting is how the lender proves it did that.
The eight things a lender must weigh
The rule does not leave the inputs to the lender. It lists eight. Your income or assets, not counting the home. Your employment status. The payment on this loan. The payment on any simultaneous loan. Taxes, insurance and association fees. Your existing debts, alimony and child support. Your debt to income ratio or your residual income. And your credit history. Almost all of it must be verified with third party records.
Stated income is finished
The rule closes the loop on evidence. A creditor must verify what it relies on using reasonably reliable third party records, and it names them: an I R S tax return transcript, filed returns, W two forms, payroll statements, bank records, employer records, government benefit records. The Bureau's own compliance guide puts the consequence bluntly. It is no longer possible to originate loans based on stated income.
The forty-three percent rule is repealed
This is the part almost every article gets wrong. In December twenty twenty the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a final rule that, in its own words, removes the General Q M loan definition's forty three percent D T I limit and replaces it with price based thresholds. Check it yourself. The phrase forty three percent appears zero times in the current text of the regulation. So does Appendix Q, the appendix the old ratio was calculated on.
Why the old number will not die
Because the source is still online and still hosted by the Bureau. The March twenty sixteen compliance guide, version two point four, is still served from the C F P B's own file server and still refers to the forty three percent D T I requirement under the general Q M provision. It was accurate when it was published and it has been superseded twice since. The April twenty twenty one replacement does not contain the phrase at all.
A price test, not a ratio
What replaced it turns on the loan's price. A qualified mortgage is one for which the annual percentage rate does not exceed the average prime offer rate for a comparable transaction by the amounts specified. Read the direction carefully. Take your A P R, subtract the benchmark rate, and the gap has to land below the threshold. Two and a quarter percentage points for a first lien at the top loan size tier, more for smaller loans.
FHA's thirty-one forty-three is a different number
If you have an F H A loan you will meet the ratios thirty one and forty three, and the coincidence is unfortunate. That forty three has nothing to do with the repealed one. It is H U D's ceiling for manually underwritten mortgages only, measured against Effective Income, an F H A defined term. Different agency, different denominator, narrower scope. With compensating factors the handbook allows up to forty and fifty.
Clear to close is not official
Two more things worth knowing. Clear to close appears zero times in the eighteen hundred and eighty six page F H A handbook, and so does the three C's. They are useful shorthand, not status. And nobody official publishes how long underwriting takes, so ignore any average you read. The only federal clocks are on the paperwork. The full breakdown is on Dreamy Leads dot com.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a 43% debt-to-income limit for a mortgage?
Not under federal law. The CFPB's December 2020 final rule removed the General Qualified Mortgage definition's 43 percent DTI limit and replaced it with price-based thresholds, and the phrase “43 percent” appears zero times in the current text of 12 CFR 1026.43. Individual lenders and loan programs can still apply their own ratio limits.
Is FHA's 31/43 the same as the repealed 43% QM limit?
No. FHA's 31/43 are maximum qualifying ratios that HUD's Handbook 4000.1 applies only to manually underwritten mortgages, measured against FHA's defined term Effective Income. The repealed 43% was a Regulation Z threshold on total monthly debt obligations against total monthly income.
What does clear to close mean officially?
Officially, nothing. The phrase appears zero times in HUD's 1,886-page Handbook 4000.1 and zero times in the Regulation Z and Regulation B sections that govern the process. It is industry shorthand for a lender's internal judgment that underwriting conditions are satisfied.
Sources
- Dreamy Leads Research Financial Data Explorer
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Code of Federal Regulations
